Despite COVID-19 infections running rampant in many states, nearly 1,000 academic institutions are welcoming people back to their campuses.
Fans filled Texas A&M’s University’s football stadium at a game last year. This year, pandemic plans will halve capacity to around 50,000 people.Credit: Daniel Dunn/Icon Sportswire via Getty
At Cornell University in Ithaca, New York, president Martha Pollack announced that the campus would be reopening because mathematical modelling suggested that there would be fewer COVID-19 cases that way. If the campus were kept closed, many students would still live in shared housing in and around Ithaca, a survey found. These students would drive an outbreak of some 7,200 cases, according to a model created by operations researcher Peter Frazier and his colleagues. That could be mitigated if the students were on campus and being tested regularly. In that scenario, the model predicts just 1,200 cases.
Đang xem: W students
Others question Cornell’s rationale. Inglesby says universities should tell students from outside the area to stay at home, rather than tailoring a plan around their desire to show up. “That’s not making decisions in the right order,” he says. Cornell sociologist Kim Weeden pointed out in a tweet that the survey was carried out in late spring, when cases were declining — and it didn’t poll the parents of students. “Whoever is footing the bills may have quite different ideas on the subject,” she wrote.
Frazier says that merely urging students, many of whom have already signed leases, to stay at home would be a toothless request. And although fewer students might show up than planned to do so in May, his model still suggests keeping them on campus, where testing can be required, is safest overall. “The conclusion that residential is safer than online is really, really, robust to the number of students returning,” he says.
Universities will never be the same after the coronavirus crisis
Cornell does plan to test students, faculty members and staff frequently, using pooled testing to keep costs down, Frazier says. “We have enormous capacity in our vet lab, set up for epidemics in dairy cows.” The exact frequency depends on exposure: a staff member who works in food services will be tested more often than someone on the landscaping team, for example. Those testing positive will be housed in one of the 1,200 hotel rooms Cornell has reserved in Tompkins County throughout the term. Contact tracing will be handled by the Tompkins County health department.
In May, participants in a meeting of the Association of Independent Colleges & Universities in Massachusetts teamed up to model COVID-19’s spread on campuses. The resulting analysis1 suggests that outbreaks can be prevented during an 80-day shortened semester if students are tested every 2 days, even if the tests don’t catch every case. The cost would be about $470 per student. In response, a number of universities, including Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut, plan to test their residential students multiple times per week. They also plan to isolate students who test positive, and to trace their contacts.
Researchers who are advising universities say that models are imperfect, but they remain one of the few scientific tools available to guide reopening decisions. “There is going to be no clinical trial; we have to model this,” says Rochelle Walensky, chief of the Division of Infectious Diseases at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, and a co-author of the analysis of potential COVID-19 campus spread. She is also a member of the Harvard reopening committee, and says she has spoken to “many university opening committees”.
The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign is able to test all its 50,000 students, 2,800 faculty members and 8,200 staff twice a week with its own saliva polymerase-chain-reaction test2, which costs just $10 a pop. Students will get a notification on the Safer in Illinois app, and then head to one of 50 kiosks on campus. “You walk up, you swipe your card, you dribble into a tube, you drop it into a bag and you are done — and within 3 hours it is in your phone,” says chemist Martin Burke, who helped design the test. Those who don’t get tested won’t be able to access campus buildings. “This is 2020, not 1918. We don’t want to just revert to the methodologies from back then,” says Burke. “How do we leverage the tremendous power of modern science? We can crush this thing.”
Two decades of pandemic war games failed to account for Donald Trump
The University of California, Berkeley, is planning limited in-person classes. It had some luck over the summer in quashing an outbreak among undergraduates with an app being tested by public-health researcher Maya Petersen. The app included daily questionnaires about physical symptoms as well as anxiety about coronavirus, plus an easy way to sign up to get a free test, no questions asked. In designing it, Petersen used what she had learnt in her research on controlling HIV transmission — including the importance of not shaming people (such as, in the case of COVID-19, students who aren’t socially distancing). Petersen says her non-judgemental app was such a hit that students were recommending it to each other, and it managed to help catch and corral an outbreak centred around fraternity parties. “There was cluster of cases, but the students talked to each other and told each other about the study. And they did it in droves. They self-referred each other.”
At the University of California, Irvine, campus managers will keep an eye on how crowded buildings are, using a system that has been under development for years with a grant from the US Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency. As students’ phones and laptops search for Wi-Fi signals in buildings, they generate ‘probe events’ that will be used to estimate how many people are in each area. A dashboard alerts managers to overcrowding, which can then be addressed by putting up signs, moving furniture around or giving students a stern talking-to. In the future, students might also get an alert if they have shared space with a person known to have COVID-19.
The system strips away IP addresses and other identifying info, but students who are still unhappy about having their data collected can opt out. Sharad Mehrotra, a computer scientist who leads the project, says it will help the university limit transmission of COVID-19. “When the pandemic started and things were locked down, the responsibility of handling the situation largely resided with the government,” says Mehrotra. “But as things open up, the responsibility shifts to the community. It shifts to individuals, but also to organizations. What roles organizations can play has not been settled yet.”
Some faculty members aren’t happy with reopening plans, and are making that known. Thirty tenured academics at UNC, which started in-person classes on 10 August, published an open letter asking students to stay away. “We need you to stay home in order to protect yourselves and your fellow students, your teachers, the many workers who serve you on campus, the residents of Chapel Hill and Carrboro, and your own family members and loved ones,” the letter said.
The university announced on 17 August that it had tested 954 students in the preceding week and that the percentage of positive tests had risen from 2.8% to 13.6%. More than 500 students are now in isolation and quarantine. Because of this, university leaders decided to change their plans for holding in-person undergraduate classes. “Due to this announcement as well as the reduction of campus activities, we expect the majority of our current undergraduate residential students to change their residential plans for the fall. We are working to identify additional effective ways to further achieve de-densification of our residential halls and our campus facilities,” said a statement by the university’s chancellor, Kevin M. Guskiewicz, and provost, Robert A. Blouin.
Before shifting to online classes, UNC’s dorms were at 60% capacity; many students have since left. Masks were required and testing was available, but only for those in high-risk groups or with symptoms, or who are suspected to have come into contact with an infected person.
Almost all plans for a physical return to campus include masks, social distancing and bans on social gatherings, potentially removing the core motivation for many students to attend in person. Two of the biggest American football conferences, the Big Ten and Pac-12, announced on 11 August that they won’t play this autumn, in what many see as a sign that most collegiate sports will be postponed until at least next spring.
Some researchers say it will be difficult to stop informal gatherings and off-campus parties, no matter how many apps students download or pledges they sign. Many question whether it is realistic to expect young people in the most intensely social phase of their lives to follow rules to the letter. Less than 60% of the students SimpsonScarborough surveyed said they were willing to “avoid social events and parties with more than 10 people”.
McClure has strong doubts about the autumn. “Never in my lifetime have I seen the level of compliance that is being expected for this to work.”
Updates & Corrections
Update 17 August 2020: This story has been updated to include the announcement by the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill to shift from in-person undergraduate classes to remote versions.
Update 27 August 2020: This story has been updated with more information about how universities are coping with outbreaks of COVID-19.